India–US Trade Reset - Reduced Tariffs, Strategic Bargains and the China Factor
Feb. 3, 2026
Why in News?
After months of tariff-driven tensions, India–US economic relations have witnessed a significant thaw following a telephonic conversation between the Indian Prime Minister and the U.S. President.
The U.S. has agreed to reduce its reciprocal tariff on “Made in India” products to 18%, down sharply from an effective 50% imposed in 2025.
The announcement signals a possible reconfiguration of India–US trade ties amid global supply chain realignments and geopolitical churn.
What’s in Today’s Article?
Key Developments
Strategic Significance
Challenges and Concerns
Way Forward
Conclusion
Key Developments:
Reduction in U.S. tariffs on Indian goods:
The U.S. will reduce reciprocal tariffs on Indian exports from 50% to 18%.
This includes rollback of 25% tariff, and an additional 25% penalty imposed due to India’s import of Russian oil.
The Indian PM termed this a boost to Make in India, improving market access for Indian exports.
Claim of a broader trade deal:
President Trump announced that India and the U.S. have “agreed” to a trade deal.
According to Trump, India has committed to reducing tariff and non-tariff barriers on U.S. goods (claimed to be moving towards “zero”), purchasing over $500 billion worth of U.S. products, including -
Energy (natural gas, coal),
Technology,
Agricultural goods, and
Nuclear equipment.
For perspective, India’s total goods imports in FY25 were $720.24 billion.
Energy and geopolitics:
Trump claimed that India has agreed to stop buying Russian oil, increase imports from the U.S. and potentially Venezuela.
These assertions have not yet been officially confirmed by India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA).
The claims link trade concessions to broader U.S. strategic objectives, including ending the Russia–Ukraine war.
Strategic timing and diplomatic context:
The announcement coincided with External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar’s visit to the U.S. (Feb 2–4).
He is participating in the Critical Minerals Ministerial, focused on supply chain resilience, clean energy transition, and reducing dependence on China in critical minerals.
India, the U.S., and other mineral-rich countries are expected to sign a non-binding framework covering mining, processing, recycling, and pricing mechanisms.
Strategic Significance:
India as a counterweight to China:
The tariff cut reinforces the U.S. view of India as a strategic ally and counterweight to China.
With Western economies imposing anti-dumping duties and trade restrictions on Chinese products, India gains a relative advantage in accessing U.S. and EU markets.
Macroeconomic and market implications:
The deal was seen as critical amid concerns over capital outflows, pressure on the rupee.
Expectations include improved investor sentiment, potential strengthening of the rupee, and a positive market response.
India’s expanding trade footprint:
With trade arrangements now in place with the U.S., UK, and EU, India is better positioned than many East Asian economies that rely heavily on Chinese investment.
A tentative thaw in India–China trade relations adds another layer of complexity.
Challenges and Concerns:
Ambiguity in the fine print:
The actual benefits depend on the detailed terms of the agreement, which remain unclear.
Past experience suggests that U.S. negotiations under President Trump tend to be extractive.
Energy and strategic autonomy: Any formal commitment to halt Russian oil imports could constrain India’s strategic autonomy and energy security.
Dependence on China: India’s imports from China exceeded $112 billion last year. China’s dominance in rare earth elements has already impacted Indian sectors such as automobiles.
Risk of Chinese retaliation: China has warned of consequences if trade agreements are concluded at its expense, raising concerns of indirect economic or supply-chain retaliation.
Domestic political reactions: The opposition criticised the move, alleging India had “capitulated” under U.S. pressure.
Way Forward:
Clarity and transparency: India must ensure that commitments—especially on tariffs, energy imports, and non-tariff barriers—are clearly defined and mutually balanced.
Leverage export: Leverage improved access to the U.S. market to boost manufacturing, value-added exports, and employment.
Supply chain diversification: Use platforms like the Critical Minerals Ministerial to reduce dependence on China.
Strategic balancing: Maintain autonomy in energy sourcing and foreign policy while deepening ties with the West.
Domestic capacity building: Align trade gains with Make in India, PLI schemes, and MSME competitiveness.
Conclusion:
The reduction of U.S. tariffs on Indian goods to 18% marks a decisive reset in India–US trade relations and underscores India’s rising strategic relevance in a fragmented global trade order.
While the move opens significant economic and geopolitical opportunities, its long-term value for India will hinge on the fine print, preservation of strategic autonomy, and the ability to convert improved market access into sustained export-led growth.
Dear Student,
You have still not entered your mailing address. Please enter the address where all the study materials will be sent to you. (If applicable).